How do people use Church (or not)?

As well as reading about Church coming and going, I've been reading about how people in different cultures use their computers. Forrester research has been investigating the “Groundswell” of new media. Its research analyses usage like this:
The categories are made up around what you do online. Spectators read blogs, Critics Comment on blogs, Creators originate blogs. Joiners use Facebook et al. You get the idea. An individual can be on several rungs at the same time. Proportions on each rung are vastly different in different cultures. In the US, 25% are creators — in Europe only 10%. 53% of Europeans are inactives, 41% of Americans, only 37% of South Koreans.

OK Team. This method has absolutely no tested validity at all in the field of religious participation, but let's sketch on the back of an envelope. If patterns of church involvement were similar, and for all I know they are, In the UK roughly 70% = 35m people say they are Christians. Most actives would be, er 10% = 3·5m weekly participants. Anglicans would be just under 1m bums on pews a week. Inactives would be 53% = 26·5m. They are.
Spooky, ja? Anyone care to develop this kind of approach?

Church — Six Buckets of Sick

Interesting Comment by David Keen on this week’s annual Social Trends figures for the UK. He’s also noted a growing number of Church leavers based on recent work by Richter and Francis. Like all social groups, churches face accelerating churn rates, some higher than others, with more complex and diverse reasons for dropping out.

The Barna Group researches American religious attitudes and practice. It’s Evangelical, with a high commitment to excellence and accuracy. Last year I read its serious work on the black hole opening up in 18-30 US discipleship demographics. Members of this age group, including those within the churches, report six overwhelming turn-offs about the Church:

1. Hypocritical
   fuelled by some well-known scandals, there is increasing scepticism about inauthenticity among Evangelical Christians
   
2. Too focussed on gaining converts
   Many people, including those who have been members of Evangelical Churches, feel they are not taken seriously as people, but rather prized as converts
   
3. Antihomosexual
   Barna takes a Conservative line on homosexuality itself, but notes popular disgust at the way American Evangelical Christians appear to look down on gays and lesbians, with bigoted fixations about them. Simply announcing they are not bigoted does not dispel the overwhelming impression they are.
   
4. Sheltered
   Old-fashioned, boring, and out of touch with reality, with a preference for shallow solutions over searching spiritual and moral questions.
   
5. Political
   Motivated by a right wing political agenda, including support for the Iraq war, and Conservative social policy
   
6. Judgmental
   Swift to judge others, dishonest, and fixated on rules rather than people

I suspect there is significant difference in the UK, partly because the public face of religion is less protestant Evangelical, partly because UK politicians “don’t do God” and our right wing agendas are far more secular. However localised versions of these factors doubtless do turn people off Christianity in the UK — it’s worth reflecting which ones in particular, and how...

One thing’s for sure, bearing in mind recent discussions of church size. To the extent that people are accepted and respected as they are Churches seem to flourish qualitatively within their contexts. Pushy sectarian ones (whether they do it for “Evangelical” or Social clique-serving reasons) gather birds of a feather up to a point by being distinctive and driving hard, but plateau within a niche with eclcetic congregations along with a high and increasing churn rate. A small residual core of heavies reinforce their own sense of righteousness by ranting and bearing down hard on others, but with diminishing self-awareness on their way to the ghetto. The Crass utilitarian welcome and the tale their leavers tell says it all..